How to Write Excellent A-Level German Essays
- Jens Olesen
- Mar 10, 2024
- 35 min read
Updated: Jul 15
A-level German essays – whether on literature or film – require a mix of strong language skills, critical analysis, and effective structure. This guide will walk you through everything you need to excel, from understanding the exam task to polishing your writing style. We’ll also highlight key differences in tackling literary versus film essays, provide useful German essay phrases, and show example themes using Der Besuch der alten Dame, Der Vorleser, Goodbye Lenin! and Das Leben der Anderen. By the end, you’ll have a clear roadmap for crafting A* essays – and know where to find expert help if you need it.

Understanding the Essay Task
Before you put pen to paper, make sure you fully understand what the exam is asking for. In AQA and Edexcel A-Level German, Paper 2 requires you to write two essays in German, each on a different work (you can’t choose the same book or film twice). AQA’s exam gives 2 hours for two essays; Edexcel’s allows 2 hours 40 minutes (because Edexcel includes a translation and expects slightly longer essays, around 300–400 words each). Regardless of the board, each essay is marked out of 40 and counts for 20% of the A-level.
Read the question carefully. Identify key words (e.g. “Inwiefern…?”, “Analysieren Sie…”, “Bewerten Sie…”) and understand what you are being asked to do. Are examiners asking to what extent something is true, to analyse how a theme is presented, or to evaluate a statement? Take a few minutes to analyse the wording of the prompt and think about why it’s phrased that way. For example, if a question begins “Inwiefern ist X wichtig…?”, it’s inviting you to discuss in what ways and how much X is important. If it says “Analysieren Sie…”, you need to break down how something is done, not just describe what happens.
Brainstorm relevant points before writing. Jot down the themes, characters, or scenes that relate directly to the question. Ask yourself: Which aspects of the work will best support my argument? Examiners reward focused, well-supported analysis, not plot summary. Avoid the common pitfall of simply retelling the story; instead, aim to interpret and evaluate it. Everything you include should help answer the essay question. As a rule, quality over quantity: it’s better to present a few well-analysed points than many irrelevant ones.
Finally, keep the assessment criteria in mind. Both AQA and Edexcel emphasise content (analysis of the work, relevance to the question, critical thought) and language (accuracy and range of German). Examiners are looking for a clear argument, evidence of insight into the text/film, and accurate, varied German. In short: address the question directly, demonstrate you understand the work on a deeper level, and write in good German. Do this, and you’re already halfway to a top grade!
Structure and Planning
A logical essay structure not only helps the reader follow your ideas but also ensures you cover everything needed in a time-pressured exam. High-quality essays don’t emerge by accident – they result from careful planning and organisation. Let’s break down how to plan and structure your essay for maximum impact.
1. Plan Before You Write: Spend the first 5–10 minutes planning your response. It may feel like time lost, but planning yields a clearer and more cohesive essay. Here’s how to plan effectively:
Dissect the Question: Underline the key terms and clarify what type of response is needed (analysis, discussion, comparison, etc.). Identify the topic (what work or theme you must discuss) and the task (how you must discuss it – e.g. evaluate, argue, describe). For instance, “Inwiefern ist Hanna eine tragische Figur in Der Vorleser?” signals that you should consider in what ways Hanna is portrayed tragically, implying a need to discuss her character arc, flaws, and fate.
Brainstorm Ideas: Quickly write down relevant points, examples and German terms that come to mind. For a literary essay, this might include key quotations and the themes they illustrate; for a film essay, key scenes or cinematic techniques. Think about characters, relationships, historical context, author/director’s message – whichever relates to the question. At this stage, list more than you’ll use, then prioritise your strongest points. Not all points are equally important – choose 2–4 main arguments that best answer the question, have solid evidence, and allow for deep analysis.
Outline the Structure: Decide on the order of your arguments. A common approach is to have three body paragraphs (for example, discussing three different themes or aspects of the question), plus an introduction and a conclusion. Figure out what each paragraph will focus on. A possible outline might be: Introduction (present argument/thesis) → Paragraph 1 (first supporting point) → Paragraph 2 (second point) → Paragraph 3 (counterpoint or third aspect) → Conclusion (synthesise and reaffirm thesis). If it helps, jot down a quick list of your chosen points in a logical sequence.
2. Write a Strong Introduction: Start your essay with a clear roadmap. The introduction should set the stage and clearly convey your direction to the examiner. In an opening paragraph, try to accomplish the following:
Introduce the work and topic: Name the book/film and the aspect you’ll discuss, in a way that rephrases the question. This shows you’re focused and not going off-topic.
State your thesis: This is your central argument or answer to the question in one or two sentences. A good thesis is specific and debatable – it should take a clear stance that you will then support with evidence. For example: “In Der Vorleser, Schlink uses Hanna’s character to argue that personal guilt cannot be separated from collective shame.” This directly addresses a question about guilt and already hints at your perspective.
Outline your main points: Briefly mention the key points or themes you will explore in the essay to support your thesis. Essentially, give the reader a mini “contents” of your argument’s structure.
Example (Introduction in German):“In Bernhard Schlinks Der Vorleser wird das Thema der Schuld als zentrales Element dargestellt. In diesem Aufsatz werde ich untersuchen, wie Hannas Geheimnis und Michaels Konflikte die Frage nach persönlicher versus kollektiver Schuld verdeutlichen, und zeigen, dass die Aufarbeitung der Vergangenheit für die Nachkriegsgeneration mit tiefen moralischen Konflikten verbunden ist.”(“In Bernhard Schlink’s The Reader, the theme of guilt is portrayed as a central element. In this essay I will examine how Hanna’s secret and Michael’s conflicts illuminate the question of personal versus collective guilt, and show that coming to terms with the past is fraught with deep moral conflicts for the post-war generation.”)
This intro names the work and theme, presents a clear thesis (that the novel highlights tension between personal and collective guilt), and outlines the two main aspects to be discussed (Hanna’s secret and Michael’s inner conflict).
3. Develop Coherent Body Paragraphs: The body of your essay is where you earn most of your marks. Each paragraph should be a building block in your overall argument. A good rule of thumb is one main idea per paragraph, supported by evidence and explanation. Here’s how to structure body paragraphs for maximum clarity:
Topic sentence: Begin each paragraph with a sentence that states the focus of that paragraph and ties it to the essay question. This acts as a mini-introduction to the paragraph. For example: “Ein zentrales Thema in Der Besuch der alten Dame ist die Käuflichkeit der Gerechtigkeit.” This not only tells us the paragraph will discuss the theme of justice being for sale, but also relates directly to a prompt about the moral of the play.
Evidence and examples: After the topic sentence, present your evidence. This could be a quotation (for literature) or a description of a scene or technique (for film). Always choose evidence that clearly supports the point you’re making. If the essay is on a literary text, integrate short quotes in German and translate or explain them if needed. If it’s on a film, you might describe a key moment or reference a line of dialogue or a cinematic element (lighting, camera angle, music) as evidence. For instance, “Im Film Goodbye Lenin! erzählt Alex kontinuierlich Lügen, z.B. indem er alte Ost-Nachrichten fälscht, um seiner kranken Mutter die Wahrheit über die Wende zu verbergen.” This describes a concrete example (Alex faking news broadcasts) as evidence for a point about truth and lies in the film.
Analysis: Don’t assume the evidence speaks for itself – explain how it supports your argument. This is the most crucial part of each paragraph. Comment on what the quote or scene shows about the characters or themes, and tie it back to the question. For example, if you provided a quote where a character expresses despair, analyse why this is important: Does it illustrate a broader theme? Does it reveal the character’s development? If writing about film, explain how a directorial choice (e.g. dim lighting in a scene) reinforces a mood or message. Make sure your analysis is in German and uses specific terms (like Thema, Charakterentwicklung, Symbolik, Atmosphäre, etc.).
Link back to the question: End the paragraph by explicitly connecting your discussion back to the essay question or your thesis. This could be one sentence that wraps up why this paragraph’s point is significant. For example: “Damit wird deutlich, dass Dürrenmatt mit Claire Zachanassians Angebot die Moral einer ganze Stadt auf die Probe stellt – und somit die Frage nach Gerechtigkeit und Korruption ins Zentrum des Dramas rückt.” This concluding sentence of a paragraph about Claire’s offer in Der Besuch der alten Dame ties the analysis back to the themes of justice and corruption, directly addressing the essay topic.
Following a Point–Evidence–Analysis–Link structure for each paragraph keeps your writing focused and coherent. Remember, three well-developed paragraphs usually suffice for an A-level essay, so long as each offers a distinct piece of the argument.
4. Conclude Effectively: The conclusion is your final chance to impress the examiner. It should neatly wrap up your argument and reinforce that you answered the question. In your conclusion:
Summarise the key points you made in the essay (very briefly – one sentence per point).
Re-state your thesis in light of the discussion, showing how the evidence you presented has proven your argument. Avoid simply copying your introduction; instead, rephrase it to reflect the insights gained.
End with a closing thought: This could be a broader implication or a final poignant observation. For example, you might conclude an essay on Das Leben der Anderen by noting how the film not only tells a personal story but also serves as a cautionary tale about surveillance and humanity.
Example (Conclusion in German):“Zusammenfassend lässt sich sagen, dass Das Leben der Anderen die Verwandlung eines ehemals linientreuen Stasi-Offiziers in einen ‘guten Menschen’ eindrucksvoll darstellt. Durch Wieslers wachsende Empathie und moralische Kehrtwende zeigt der Film, wie Kunst und Menschlichkeit selbst im Überwachungsstaat triumphieren können. Abschließend unterstreicht diese Charakterentwicklung die Hauptbotschaft des Films: echte Menschlichkeit kann selbst unter drückender staatlicher Kontrolle entstehen und bestehen.”(“In summary, The Lives of Others powerfully depicts the transformation of a once strictly loyal Stasi officer into a ‘good man.’ Through Wiesler’s growing empathy and moral about-face, the film shows how art and humanity can triumph even in a surveillance state. In conclusion, this character development underlines the film’s central message: genuine humanity can emerge and endure even under oppressive state control.”)
This conclusion briefly recaps the argument (Wiesler’s transformation as central to the film) and delivers a final insight about the triumph of humanity, directly tying back to the essay question about the film’s message.
5. Manage Your Time: In the exam, timing is key. As a guideline, if you have ~60 minutes per essay, aim to spend ~5-10 minutes planning, ~45 minutes writing, and ~5 minutes proofreading. Stick to your plan – don’t get carried away in details so much that you run out of time for the conclusion or the second essay. It’s better to have a complete essay with a conclusion than an unfinished one, even if the body is brilliant.
By planning well and structuring your essay clearly, you create a strong foundation. Your ideas will flow logically, and the examiner will easily see that you’re addressing the question directly and substantively.
Key Differences Between Literary and Film Essays
A-Level German essays can be about literary texts (novels, plays) or films. While the core skills – analysis, structure, critical thinking – are the same for both, there are some important differences in approach. Understanding these will help you tailor your writing to the type of work you’re discussing.
1. Types of Evidence – Quote vs. Scene: In a literature essay, your evidence will primarily be direct quotations from the text. In a film essay, your “quotations” are specific scenes or cinematic details from the movie. Examiners do not require you to remember exact lines of dialogue from films (and won’t penalise you for not quoting film dialogue), but you should describe key moments in detail. For example, rather than quoting Alex’s lines from Goodbye Lenin! verbatim, you might describe the scene where he recreates news broadcasts to maintain the illusion of the GDR for his mother. In a novel like Der Vorleser, however, using a short quote such as “Warum hast du getan, als kennst du mich nicht?” can powerfully illustrate Michael’s shame in public, so long as you then discuss its significance.
For literature, incorporate short quotes in German to support your points whenever relevant – these are concrete proof of the author’s language or the character’s voice. For film, you’ll reference visual evidence: discuss aspects like cinematography, soundtrack, lighting, camera angles, set design, or actor expressions as they relate to the theme. For instance, if writing about Das Leben der Anderen, you might note the lighting in Wiesler’s surveillance attic (dark, cold) versus the warm light in Dreyman’s apartment to underscore the theme of oppression versus life. Also, mention significant actions or events in the film: e.g. “Christa-Maria verrät Dreyman unter dem Druck der Stasi,” explaining how this betrayal is filmed and why it matters.
2. Analytical Focus – Literary Techniques vs. Film Techniques: When writing about literature, you should be aware of literary techniques the author uses: narrative perspective (is it first-person or third-person?), symbolism and motifs (e.g. the use of the color yellow in Der Besuch der alten Dame to symbolize corruption), structure of the text (flashbacks, chapter divisions), style of language (is it simple or complex, formal or informal?), and so on. Commenting on these can deepen your analysis: “Schlink schreibt in einer klaren, nüchternen Sprache, die Michaels innere Konflikte umso deutlicher hervorhebt,” or “Dürrenmatt nutzt groteske Elemente, um Tragik und Komik zu vermischen.” These observations show you understand how the author’s craft conveys themes.
For films, your analysis can include film-specific techniques. Discuss the director’s choices: camera shots (close-ups vs. wide shots), contrast in lighting, use of music and silence, editing pace, colour palette, symbolism in imagery, etc. For example, “In Goodbye Lenin!, Regisseur Wolfgang Becker setzt originale Nachrichtenausschnitte ein, um den historischen Realismus zu betonen,” or “die wechselnde Farbpalette spiegelt Alex’ Gefühlswelt wider.” Discussing these cinematic elements will demonstrate to the examiner that you understand the film as an art form, not just as a story.
3. Contextual Discussion: Both books and films are influenced by their historical and social context, but how you use context might differ slightly. In literature essays, context (e.g. the author’s background or the time period of the setting) can be mentioned if it’s relevant to the question. For instance, noting that Der Vorleser is part of Germany’s Vergangenheitsbewältigung (coming to terms with the past) literature can enrich an essay about guilt and memory. In film essays, context might involve historical events depicted (like the fall of the Berlin Wall in Goodbye Lenin! or the GDR surveillance state in Das Leben der Anderen). It can also include the film’s reception or purpose. However, avoid excessive off-topic context – everything must tie back to the work itself and the essay question. A sentence or two connecting the theme to real-world history or the author’s intent can be very useful, but lengthy digressions will not score extra marks.
4. Use of Terminology: Adapt your vocabulary to the medium. If it’s a play or novel, you’ll use terms like Roman, Novelle, Drama, Erzähler, Hauptfigur, Nebenfigur, Kapitel, Stil, Metapher, etc. If it’s a film, employ words like Film, Regisseur, Szene, Kameraeinstellung (camera shot), Schnitt (editing), Beleuchtung (lighting), Filmmusik (score), Schauspieler, Zuschauer, etc. Using appropriate terminology shows subject-specific knowledge. For example, “Die Schlussszene von Das Leben der Anderen verwendet keine Hintergrundmusik, was die Spannung erhöht,” or “Im Höhepunkt des Romans Der Vorleser – dem Gerichtsprozess – wechselt die Erzählperspektive nicht, sondern bleibt bei Michael, um seine innere Unruhe zu verdeutlichen.” Don’t overdo jargon, but a few well-placed technical terms can impress.
5. Quotations and Dialogue: One notable difference: quoting dialogue. In literary texts, quoting dialogue is as valid as quoting narrative, since it’s all written text. In films, quoting a character’s spoken lines can be effective, but it’s not essential. The AQA mark scheme notes that direct quotes from films aren’t specifically rewarded, but they can illustrate your point well if used appropriately. So if a line of dialogue really encapsulates a theme, you can include it (in German). For example, “‘Die DDR, die ich für meine Mutter schuf, wird immer die DDR bleiben, die ich mir vielleicht gewünscht hätte,’ sagt Alex am Ende,” to discuss Ostalgie. Just make sure to analyze its meaning. However, it’s perfectly fine (and often clearer) to describe the situation in your own words without quoting, e.g. “Alex bemerkt am Ende, dass das idealisierte DDR-Bild für seine Mutter auch für ihn ein Trost geworden ist.”
In summary, the main difference between literary and film essays lies in what you analyse and how you present evidence. For literature: dissect the text and language itself; for film: discuss the visual storytelling. Nonetheless, in both cases, you must build an argument that engages critically with the work. Many students study one book and one film – if that’s you, be conscious of switching your approach appropriately between the two essays. If you treat a film like a book (or vice versa), you might miss key aspects. But if you apply the right lens to each, you’ll show the examiner you’re comfortable in both realms of analysis.
Style, Register, and Common Mistakes
How you write is almost as important as what you write. In this section, we’ll cover the style and register expected in A-level German essays, and highlight some common mistakes (with solutions) so you can avoid them.
1. Adopt an Academic Yet Accessible Style: Aim for a formal, academic register in your German writing, but one that remains clear and readable. This means:
Use formal vocabulary and constructions. Avoid slang, overly casual phrases, or contractions (for example, write “möchte nicht” instead of “will nicht” if appropriate, and certainly avoid any text-speak). Phrases like “Meiner Meinung nach”, “Es lässt sich nicht leugnen, dass…”, “Es wäre zu einfach, zu behaupten, dass…” help maintain a scholarly tone.
Prefer the present tense when discussing literature or film content. Just as in English we use the literary present (“Dürrenmatt portrays…”) to discuss events in a text/film, in German you typically use Präsens: “Dreyman schreibt einen Artikel” or “Güllen steht für eine Gesellschaft…”. Past tenses may be needed when referring to historical context or backstory, but keep the analysis in present.
Write in third person or impersonal constructions. It’s acceptable to say “ich denke” in German essays (unlike some very formal English writing), but you can often eliminate the first person by using impersonal phrases: “Es scheint, dass…” (it seems that…), “Man könnte argumentieren, dass…” (one could argue that…). These sound objective and scholarly. For instance, instead of “Ich bin der Meinung, dass Wiesler ein Opfer des Systems ist,” you might write “Wiesler kann als Opfer des Systems betrachtet werden.”
Maintain clarity. Don’t sacrifice clear communication just to sound fancy. It’s better to write a straightforward sentence that is correct and meaningful than a very convoluted sentence that ends up ungrammatical. That said, vary your sentences (see point 3 below) and use complex structures where appropriate to show off your German range.
2. Beware of False Friends and Translation Traps: When writing under time pressure, students sometimes directly translate an English thought into German and end up with awkward or incorrect phrasing. Be cautious with words like “character” (use Figur, Person for a character in a story, not Charakter, which means personality/character trait) or “theme” (use Thema, not Themen in singular). If you’re not sure how to say a concept in German, try rephrasing it in simpler German that you do know. It’s much better to have correct, simple German than incorrect, advanced German. Also, avoid anglicisms (Germanized English words) and stick to authentic German expressions. Instead of “der Film zeigt perfekt…”, you might say “der Film zeigt sehr deutlich…” since “perfekt zeigen” is not idiomatic.
3. Common Essay Mistakes (and How to Fix Them):
Weak or Unclear Thesis: A vague thesis will confuse your essay’s direction. For example, “In Der Vorleser fühlt sich Michael schuldig.” – this is too broad and simple, and doesn’t guide an argument. Fix it by being specific: “In Der Vorleser nutzt Schlink Michaels ambivalentes Verhältnis zu Hanna als Metapher für den Konflikt der Nachkriegsgeneration mit der Schuld ihrer Eltern.”. This improved thesis names a concrete relationship (Michael–Hanna), identifies a theme (guilt across generations), and sets up a debate (personal conflict reflecting societal conflict). Solution: Before writing, test your thesis: does it directly answer the question, and is it specific enough to argue for/against? If not, refine it.
Not Linking Back to the Question: One paragraph might be beautifully written but still score poorly if it doesn’t answer the question. It’s a common error to get so caught up in explaining a point that you forget to relate it to the actual essay prompt. Solution: Echo the wording of the question at the end of each paragraph to tie your point back. For instance, if the question is about the theme of Schuld in Der Vorleser, a paragraph might end: “Damit stellt Schlink die Frage, ob persönliche Gefühle die moralische Beurteilung der NS-Vergangenheit beeinflussen” – clearly referring to the moral judgment of the Nazi past, i.e. the guilt theme in the question. This technique ensures relevance.
Over-reliance on Narrative Summary: As mentioned, avoid just re-telling the plot. Even when recounting events as evidence, do so briefly and analytically, rather than as a narrative. Examiners know the plot; they want to see your interpretation. Solution: For every plot point you mention, immediately follow up with commentary or analysis. Instead of listing what happens, explain why it matters for the question.
Lack of Variety in Sentence Structure: Many short, simple sentences in a row can make your essay sound choppy and unsophisticated. Conversely, one ultra-long sentence that tries to cram too many ideas can become hard to follow (and easy to mess up grammatically). Solution: Aim for a mix of sentence lengths and structures. You might use a longer sentence with a subordinate clause to show cause and effect, followed by a short, punchy sentence for emphasis. For example: “Michaels Wut auf Hanna ist komplex, da sie sich sowohl gegen sie als auch gegen ihn selbst richtet – er fühlt Scham und Zorn zugleich. Diese innere Zerrissenheit führt schließlich dazu, dass er sich von ihr distanziert.” Here, the first sentence uses a nebensatz (subordinate clause) to pack in nuance, and the second sentence drives home the result in fewer words. Reading your essay draft aloud in practice can help identify monotonous patterns.
Grammar and Accents: At A-level, grammar accuracy is crucial. Common issues include: verb conjugations (especially irregular verbs and moving the verb to the end in subordinate clauses), adjective endings (after der words, ein words, etc.), case mistakes (Accusative vs. Dative after certain prepositions), and word order (remember the V2 rule in main clauses and the kicker words like weil sending verb to end). Don’t forget small things like capitalising nouns and the ß vs. ss (e.g. groß not gross). Solution: Dedicate a few minutes to proofreading at the end. Use a mental checklist: Check verb positions, check endings on any adjectives you used, look for noun genders if the article is missing, and quickly scan for umlauts/ß/ß where needed. It’s easier to catch these when not in the heat of composing content.
Literal Translations of Idioms: This is a special pitfall. If you think of an English idiom or expression, resist directly translating it to German (it often won’t make sense). For example, “to kill two birds with one stone” should not be translated word-for-word. Either use a known German idiom (if you’re sure of it) or just say what you mean in plain language. It’s safer to stick to what you know is correct. That being said, using some idiomatic German that you’ve learned appropriately can boost your language marks (e.g. “Es liegt auf der Hand, dass…”, “den Nagel auf den Kopf treffen” for hitting the nail on the head, etc., if relevant to your sentence).
4. Use of Advanced Structures: To access the highest mark bands for language (AO3), show off some advanced grammar, but only if you can do so accurately. Structures like Passive voice, Konjunktiv I/II, relative clauses, um...zu clauses, participial constructions (e.g. “..., wobei zu beachten ist, dass…”) can enrich your writing. For example: “Es könnte argumentiert werden, dass Dürrenmatts Güllen eine Allegorie auf die korrupte Gesellschaft ist”olesentuition.co.uk uses a passive/subjunctive (es könnte argumentiert werden) which sounds very academic. Just ensure the rest of the sentence is grammatically sound. If you’ve mastered da-/wo- wo-compounds, inversions for emphasis, or the subjunctive for reported speech, use them. Variety and complexity can impress examiners, provided the meaning stays clear and errors are minimal.
In short, write in polished German that’s appropriate for a formal essay. Be precise with word choice, maintain a formal tone, and avoid the pitfalls of poor structure or off-topic rambles. If you practice writing a few essays and get feedback, you’ll start developing a sense for this academic style. The goal is to make your essay not just an insightful analysis of the book/film, but also a demonstration of your command of the German language.
Useful Essay Phrases (Deutsch / English)
Having a toolbox of idiomatic essay phrases can save time and make your writing sound more natural. Below is a selection of useful German phrases for various functions in your essay, along with their English meanings. Try to incorporate some of these in your practice essays so you’re comfortable using them in the exam. (Just make sure you deploy them in the right context – memorising is great, but you need to understand them too!)
Einleitung und Struktur – Introduction and Structure
Im ersten Abschnitt/Teil werde ich… untersuchen – (In the first paragraph/part I will examine…)
Im zweiten Abschnitt werde ich… analysieren – (In the second paragraph I will analyze…)
Im dritten Abschnitt werde ich… diskutieren – (In the third paragraph I will discuss…)
Schließlich werde ich… erörtern und meine Hauptthesen zusammenfassen – (Finally, I will consider… and summarize my main points)
Zunächst einmal – (First of all)
Danach / Anschließend – (Afterwards / Subsequently)
Darüber hinaus – (Furthermore / In addition)
Zum Schluss – (Finally/Lastly)
Zusammenfassend lässt sich sagen, … – (In summary it can be said that, …)
Abschließend – (In conclusion/Conclusively, …)
These phrases help you signpost the structure of your essay clearly. For example: “Zunächst einmal möchte ich die Hintergrundinformationen erläutern. Darüber hinaus wird analysiert, wie… Zum Schluss werde ich die Ergebnisse zusammenfassen.”
Argumentation und Analyse – Arguing Your Case
Man könnte argumentieren, dass… – (One could argue that…)
Es lässt sich feststellen, dass… – (It can be established/ascertained that…)
Es ist wichtig zu betonen, dass… – (It is important to emphasize that…)
Es steht außer Frage, dass… – (It is beyond question that…)
Es ist unbestreitbar, dass… – (It is indisputable that…)
Im Großen und Ganzen… – (By and large / Overall…)
Es ist erwähnenswert, dass… – (It is worth mentioning that…)
Aus diesem Grund… – (For this reason…)
Dies führt zu dem Schluss, dass… – (This leads to the conclusion that…)
Nicht nur…, sondern auch… – (Not only…, but also…)
Use these to introduce points, emphasise significance, and draw conclusions. For instance: “Es lässt sich feststellen, dass Hanna sowohl Täterin als auch Opfer ist, aus diesem Grund empfindet der Leser Mitleid.”
Vergleichen, Gegenüberstellen – Contrasting and Balancing
Allerdings muss man auch bedenken, dass… – (However, one must also consider that…)
Auf der einen Seite… auf der anderen Seite… – (On the one hand… on the other hand…)
Einerseits…, andererseits… – (On one hand…, on the other hand…)
Man könnte einwenden, dass… – (One could object that… / It could be argued against that…)
Zwar ist es richtig, dass…, aber… – (It’s true that… but… / While it is correct that…, …)
These phrases are perfect for showing you can see both sides of an argument or introducing a counterargument. For example: “Einerseits folgt Alex in Goodbye Lenin! einer edlen Lüge, um seiner Mutter zu helfen, andererseits bringt ihn diese Lüge in moralische Konflikte.”
Beispiele und Bezug – Giving Examples and References
Ein anschauliches Beispiel hierfür ist… – (A vivid example of this is…)
Um dies zu veranschaulichen, kann man … betrachten. – (To illustrate this, one can consider …)
Dies zeigt sich besonders in… – (This is especially evident in…)
Wie man an (dieser Szene/diesem Zitat) sieht,… – (As one can see from (this scene/quote), …)
… illustriert/verdeutlicht dieses Thema. – (… illustrates/elucidates this theme.)
For instance: “Ein anschauliches Beispiel hierfür ist die Szene, in der Wiesler heimlich das Schriftstück entfernt – dies zeigt sich besonders in seinem entschlossenen Blick, wie viel sich seine Gesinnung geändert hat.”
Schlussfolgerungen – Concluding/Final Thoughts
Alles in allem… – (All in all...)
Somit wird deutlich, dass… – (Thus it becomes clear that…)
Abschließend lässt sich festhalten, dass… – (In conclusion, it can be stated that…)
Die aufgeführten Punkte zeigen, dass… – (The points listed show that…)
Es bleibt festzuhalten, dass… – (It remains to be noted that…)
Example: “Alles in allem erfüllen sowohl Der Vorleser als auch Das Leben der Anderen die Funktion, moralische Fragen aufzuwerfen. Abschließend lässt sich festhalten, dass beide Werke den Leser/Zuschauer dazu zwingen, über Schuld und Verantwortung nachzudenken.”
These phrases will give your essay a polished and organised feel. Practice them in sentences so you use them correctly. Don’t try to force too many – use what fits naturally with your argument. A well-placed “Man könnte einwenden, dass…” or “Es ist unbestreitbar, dass…” can really sharpen your argument’s clarity. Also remember to vary your phrases; using “also” or “dann” repeatedly for transitions, for example, will look simplistic next to the richer vocabulary above.
(Tip: For more, Olesen Tuition has a detailed post on advanced A-level German essay phrases, which can further expand your repertoire.)
Example Angles and Themes – Literature and Film Works
To give you a concrete sense of how to apply all the above, let’s look at some example essay angles for popular A-level German works. We’ll consider two literary texts and two films commonly studied (from both AQA and Edexcel lists): Der Besuch der alten Dame, Der Vorleser, Goodbye Lenin! and Das Leben der Anderen. For each, we’ll outline a potential essay focus and what kind of approach or evidence might be expected. These are illustrative examples – actual questions will vary, but they often hit similar themes.
Friedrich Dürrenmatt: Der Besuch der alten Dame (The Visit) – A common theme is the corrupting influence of wealth and the moral collapse of a community. An essay might ask, for example, “Wie behandelt Dürrenmatt das Thema Gerechtigkeit in diesem Stück? Finden Sie diese Darstellung effektiv?” (How does Dürrenmatt treat the theme of justice in this play, and is it effective?). To tackle this, you’d discuss Claire Zachanassian’s shocking offer (money in exchange for justice/murder) and how the townspeople of Güllen gradually betray their principles. Key angles include collective guilt and hypocrisy: initially, the townspeople publicly uphold justice (“lieber bleiben wir arm denn blutbefleckt” – better to remain poor than be stained with blood), but one by one they give in to temptation, symbolised by their purchasing of new yellow shoes on credit. You could argue that the grotesque blend of tragedy and comedy in the play makes its moral message more striking. Use quotations like “Man kann alles kaufen” (Claire’s retort that “one can buy anything”) to show Dürrenmatt’s cynical view of society’s integrity. An excellent essay would also mention Dürrenmatt’s intention – he called the play a “tragische Komödie” – and evaluate whether the mix of absurdity and seriousness effectively conveys the theme of justice. Don’t forget to address Claire and Ill as contrasting figures (victim-turned-avenger vs. beloved local-turned-victim) and perhaps conclude on whether justice is served or subverted in the end. Real past questions have also included discussing whether the play is more tragedy or comedy, the role of symbols (e.g. the black panther, the prosthetic limbs), and the relevance of the play’s themes to today’s world. Always link back to that core idea: moral integrity for sale.
Bernhard Schlink: Der Vorleser (The Reader) – Essays on this novel often centre on guilt, responsibility, and betrayal across generations, or on the complex character of Hanna Schmitz. A potential question: “‘Hannas Analphabetismus entschuldigt ihre Taten.’ Erklären Sie, inwiefern Sie dieser Aussage zustimmen.” (“Hanna’s illiteracy excuses her actions.’ Explain to what extent you agree with this statement.”). This invites discussion on the extent to which Hanna’s being illiterate (unable to read/write) mitigates her moral and legal culpability for her involvement in Nazi crimes. In your answer, you’d weigh Hanna’s personal tragedy – her lifelong secret shame about illiteracy – against the horrific consequences of her choices (joining the SS, participating in atrocities, and her decision in the church fire incident). Key themes to weave in: personal vs. collective guilt, shame, and the post-war generation’s struggle (Michael’s generation trying to comprehend their parents’ generation’s crimes). Evidence could include Hanna’s behaviour at the trial (her avoiding writing and ultimately taking all the blame because she won’t admit she can’t read) and Michael’s internal conflict (he is simultaneously a victim of Hanna’s betrayal and a representative of the next generation judging the earlier generation). Another popular angle is examining Michael as a narrator – can we trust his perspective? Or analysing Schlink’s style and structure (e.g. the use of a first-person narration and how it distances or engages the reader). If the question is about “Inwiefern ist Hanna eine tragische Figur?”, you’d focus on how her life is ruined by a mix of her own flaws and societal factors – a classic tragedy argument. Always support with specific instances: e.g., Hanna learning to read in prison (a redemptive yet tragic element), or the symbolic moment Michael realises “Hanna konnte nicht lesen und schreiben” – a turning point that redefines how we see her. Conclude with a clear stance on the question (e.g. perhaps: Hanna’s illiteracy helps us empathise with her, but does not excuse her involvement in atrocities – it explains, not exculpates). Real exam questions have asked about themes of Vergangenheit (the past’s influence on the present), the reliability of Michael as a narrator, and the idea of Scham (shame) and Schuld in the novel. In any case, tie it back to how Schlink provokes the reader to grapple with these moral questions.
Wolfgang Becker: Goodbye Lenin! – This film is rich with themes of change versus nostalgia (Ostalgie), family and deception, and the personal impact of historical events. A typical essay might explore, for instance, the significance of the film’s title or a main character’s role. One past question asked: “Inwiefern ist Good Bye, Lenin! ein passender Titel für diesen Film? Begründen Sie Ihre Antwort.” (To what extent is “Good Bye, Lenin!” a fitting title for this film? Give reasons for your answer.). Here, you would discuss the literal and symbolic “goodbye” to East Germany that the characters (and East Germans generally in 1989/90) experience. Points to mention include Christiane’s coma (she “sleeps through” German reunification), Alex’s elaborate ruse to protect her from the truth (creating a fake continuation of the GDR in their apartment), and how each character says farewell to the old East Germany in their own way. The title also alludes to Lenin’s statue being taken down, depicted in the film’s famous scene, symbolising the end of an era. You could argue the title is very apt because the film is about the end of the GDR and the deeply emotional process of letting go of a country and way of life. Another question might be about Alex and Christiane’s relationship: e.g. “Inwiefern ist die Beziehung zwischen Alex und Christiane wichtig für den Erfolg des Films?”. For that, you’d examine how the mother-son relationship drives the plot and provides the emotional core – Alex’s love for his mother is the reason for all the comedic and tragic situations in the film, and through their relationship, the film explores themes of truth, love, and change. Key scenes to reference include: Alex’s desperate scrambles to maintain the illusion (like getting school kids to sing East German songs, or making homemade news videos with his friend Denis), and the moment Christiane finally learns the truth about reunification. Also consider the film’s tone – it’s a Tragikomödie, mixing satire and sentimentality. If discussing Ostalgie, mention how the film portrays the positive memories of the East (the community, certain ideals) while not completely shying away from its problems (shortages, Stasi presence). Good answers often mention the use of actual historical footage and authentic '80s music to capture the atmosphere. In conclusion, tie your analysis to the broader message: perhaps that Goodbye Lenin! is about coping with sudden societal change and the lies we tell for love.
Florian Henckel von Donnersmarck: Das Leben der Anderen (The Lives of Others) – Essays on this acclaimed film frequently focus on surveillance, power, and personal transformation. A compelling angle is the moral transformation of Hauptmann Gerd Wiesler from a cold Stasi officer to a quietly defiant saviour. A past question posited: “Der Film könnte auch ‚Die Sonate vom guten Menschen‘ heißen. Inwiefern stimmen Sie dieser Aussage zu?” (The film could also be called “Sonata for a Good Man.” To what extent do you agree with this statement?). This prompt references the pivotal moment when Wiesler listens to the Sonata and experiences an awakening of conscience. In your answer, you’d explain the significance of that piece of music (composed by Dreyman’s friend Jerska as his final gift – titled “Die Sonate vom guten Menschen” in the story). Argue how the sonata scene is a turning point: Wiesler, upon hearing it, begins to question whether a person who appreciates such beauty (“Kann jemand, der diese Musik gehört hat, ein schlechter Mensch sein?” – “Can anyone who has heard this music be a bad person?”) could continue doing bad things. You might agree that this alternate title fits because the film essentially tells the story of Wiesler’s humanisation, his emergence as the “good man” influenced by art and empathy. On the other hand, you could also point out that the actual title “Das Leben der Anderen” emphasises surveillance and voyeurism – Wiesler living through “the lives of others” – which is also crucial. So a nuanced answer might say the sonata title captures the film’s moral heart, but the original title captures its broader commentary on surveillance. Other likely topics include abuse of power (e.g. Minister Hempf’s exploitation of Christa, which could come up as “Welche Bedeutung hat die Beziehung zwischen Minister Hempf und Christa-Maria?” – to which you’d discuss how that relationship triggers the plot and exemplifies GDR corruption) and the theme of loyalty vs. integrity (Wiesler’s loyalty to the regime faltering as his integrity as a human being grows). Key evidence: mention scenes like the interrogation scenes at the start (to show Wiesler’s initial cold efficiency), the typewriter search (and Wiesler’s covert intervention), and the end of the film (Dreyman’s discovery and the dedication “HGW XX/7 gewidmet” in his novel – a very emotional resolution showing Wiesler’s impact recognized). When writing about this film, incorporate film techniques: e.g. the stark contrast in lighting between the sterile Stasi offices and Dreyman’s warm, art-filled apartment, or the use of silence (notice how there’s no background music during tense Stasi surveillance scenes, heightening realism). Conclude by stressing the film’s message, perhaps noting how it illustrates that even in a repressive system, individuals have the capacity for change and goodness.
Each of these works has multiple themes and angles you could be asked about. The key is to identify what the question is focusing on (a character? a theme? the author’s technique? a specific statement or quote?) and tailor your knowledge to that. Examiners love to see you engage with the works on a deep level – show that you’re aware of ambiguities (e.g. Hanna is both sympathetic and culpable, Claire is both victim and villain, Alex’s lies are both loving and problematic, Wiesler’s rebellion is quiet but profound). Always support with specific examples from the text/film, and link them to the question. If you prepare a few major themes for each of your chosen works, along with memorised quotes or scene descriptions, you’ll be in a strong position to adapt to whatever question comes up on the exam.
(Remember: Olesen Tuition’s blog has dedicated revision guides for these works and others, which break down characters, themes, and sample questions in detail.) Use those resources for deeper insight and practice questions.)
Common Mistakes and How to Avoid Them
Even strong writers can make avoidable mistakes that weaken their essays. Be mindful of the following common pitfalls and learn how to fix them:
a. Weak or Unclear Thesis
🔴 Problem: A vague or overly broad thesis leads to an unfocused essay.
✅ Solution: Make sure your thesis is specific and debatable.
Example of a weak thesis: "In Der Vorleser fühlt sich Michael schuldig." (Too vague!)
Improved thesis: "In Der Vorleser nutzt Schlink Michaels ambivalentes Verhältnis zu Hanna als Metapher für den Konflikt der Nachkriegsgeneration mit der Schuld ihrer Eltern."
👉 Why is this better?
✔ More specific: It pinpoints a clear focus (Michael’s relationship with Hanna is central).
✔ Debatable: It introduces a debate (Is Michael wirklich schuldig? Oder projiziert er nur die Schuld der Gesellschaft auf sich?).
b. Not Linking Back to the Question
🔴 Problem: Some students go off-topic or forget to link each paragraph to the essay question.
✅ Solution: At the end of each paragraph, explicitly relate your argument back to the main question.
Example (linking a point to the question): "Michael beschreibt seine Gefühle gegenüber Hanna als 'Zorn auf ihre Verbrechen, Zorn darauf, dass sie sich nicht verteidigt, Zorn auf mich, weil ich sie geliebt habe'. Dies zeigt, dass er seine persönliche Schuld mit der historischen Schuld der Generation seiner Eltern vermischt. Damit stellt Schlink die Frage, ob persönliche Gefühle die moralische Beurteilung der NS-Vergangenheit beeinflussen."
👉 Why is this effective?
✔ Focused evidence: The quotation is clearly linked to the argument about guilt.
✔ Relevance: The last sentence explicitly ties the discussion back to the essay question (Michael’s guilt in Der Vorleser), keeping the essay on track.
c. Lack of Variety in Sentence Structure
🔴 Problem: Repetitive sentence patterns can make writing feel monotonous and flat.
✅ Solution: Use a mix of sentence lengths and structures to improve flow and keep the reader engaged.
Example of repetitive style: "Michael ist wütend auf Hanna. Er weiß nicht, wie er mit seinen Gefühlen umgehen soll. Er distanziert sich von ihr."
Improved version with varied structure: "Michaels Wut auf Hanna ist vielschichtig – sie richtet sich nicht nur gegen Hannas Verbrechen, sondern auch gegen ihn selbst. Er kann seine widersprüchlichen Gefühle nicht einordnen und flüchtet schließlich in die Distanz."
👉 Why is this better?
✔ Avoids repetition: It varies sentence length and rhythm, which makes the text more interesting.
✔ Sophisticated structures: It uses more complex constructions (e.g. nicht nur … sondern auch …) to convey nuance.
✔ Deeper analysis: The varied sentences allow a more detailed explanation of Michael’s emotional conflict.
By avoiding these common mistakes and using clear, well-structured arguments, your essay on Der Vorleser will stand out as analytical, precise, and well-written!
Exam Technique: Managing Time Effectively
Time management is crucial in the A-Level exam. Proper pacing ensures you have enough time to plan, write, and review your essay without rushing.
a. Recommended Timing for a 60-Minute Essay
🕒 5 minutes – Plan your structure and key points.
🕒 45 minutes – Write your essay.
🕒 10 minutes – Proofread and refine your work.
Allocating your time roughly as shown above will help you cover everything. Spend the first few minutes brainstorming and outlining your argument (so your essay has a clear direction). Use the bulk of the time to write, but keep an eye on the clock to ensure you can address all parts of the question. Finally, reserve the last 10 minutes to reread your essay, fix mistakes, and make small improvements – this can significantly boost clarity and accuracy.
b. Proofreading Checklist
Before you finish, use the remaining time to check for common errors:
Grammar & Spelling: Check for gender agreements, correct case endings (Nom./Akk./Dat./Gen.), verb conjugations, and word order (e.g. verb at the end in subordinate clauses). Make sure umlauts and other spelling details are correct.
Sentence Structure: Ensure there is variety in sentence length and style. If you notice many short, choppy sentences or very long ones, consider combining or breaking them up for better flow.
Linking Words & Cohesion: Make sure you use connecting words (e.g. denn, jedoch, folglich, außerdem) to make the essay logical and easy to follow. Transitions between sentences and paragraphs should be smooth, guiding the reader through your argument.
Relevance: Double-check that each paragraph clearly relates back to the essay question and your thesis. If anything sounds off-topic, consider adding a phrase to tie it in or omit it.
By systematically proofreading, you can catch and correct small mistakes or unclear passages that might otherwise cost marks.
Advanced Tips for Higher Grades (A/A*)
For top marks, you need not only sound content but also sophisticated analysis and linguistic precision. The following tips can elevate a good essay to an excellent one:
a. Advanced Vocabulary & Complex Sentences
✔ Use synonyms and precise vocabulary to avoid repetition. For example, instead of using zeigen repeatedly, you could use more specific verbs like verdeutlichen, illustrieren, or aufzeigen, depending on context. Enriching your vocabulary makes your writing more engaging and exact.✔ Incorporate idiomatic expressions and complex sentence structures. This might include using the subjunctive mood for nuance (Es könnte argumentiert werden, dass…), or idioms like Es liegt auf der Hand, dass… to sound more natural and fluent.
Example (advanced sentence): "Es lässt sich nicht leugnen, dass Brecht mit Mutter Courage eine schonungslose Kritik an den ökonomischen Mechanismen des Krieges formuliert."(Translation: "It cannot be denied that with Mother Courage, Brecht delivers an unflinching critique of the economic mechanisms of war.")
In this example, the phrase Es lässt sich nicht leugnen, dass... and the precise wording demonstrate a high level of German. Aim to write a few sentences in your essay that show this level of complexity, but make sure you fully understand any advanced phrases you use, so you employ them correctly.
b. Evaluating Different Perspectives
✔ Show critical thinking by considering counterarguments and alternative interpretations. Rather than treating your view as the only truth, acknowledge other viewpoints and then explain why you agree or disagree. Use phrases like „Einige Kritiker argumentieren, dass…“ or „Auf der anderen Seite…“ to introduce opposing opinions.
Example (considering different interpretations): "Obwohl viele Kritiker Good Bye, Lenin! als nostalgische Ostalgie-Romantisierung sehen, argumentieren andere, dass der Film vielmehr die Entfremdung nach der Wende thematisiert."(Translation: "Although many critics see Good Bye, Lenin! as a nostalgic romanticization of East Germany (Ostalgie), others argue that the film is actually about the sense of alienation after reunification.")
By presenting a sentence like this, you demonstrate that you can engage with multiple perspectives. To score in the top band, it’s not enough to state an opinion – you should also evaluate and, if relevant, refute contrasting opinions. This shows the examiner that you can think like an analyst, not just a learner reproducing facts.
Final Tips for Success
Finally, here are some general habits that can consistently improve your performance in essay writing:
✔ Practice Regularly: Write practice essays under timed conditions. Frequent practice not only improves your German writing skills but also trains you to organise ideas quickly and manage time pressure. The more you simulate exam conditions, the more comfortable you’ll become on the actual exam day.
✔ Seek Feedback: Ask teachers or native speakers to review your essays and provide constructive criticism. An outside reader can catch errors in grammar or phrasing that you might miss, and they can offer suggestions on how to strengthen your argumentation and structure. Use this feedback to target your weak areas (for example, if you consistently make mistakes with case endings or word order, focus on those in your next practice).
✔ Use Past Papers: Familiarise yourself with different types of essay questions by practising with past exam prompts. This helps you understand the range of themes and styles of questions that can appear. Time yourself and answer real past questions – this will build confidence and reveal patterns (for instance, common question themes or how questions are worded), so surprises in the exam won’t throw you off.
✔ Read Example Essays: Analyse high-scoring sample essays (from textbooks, teachers, or online resources). Pay attention to what makes them effective – look at how they structure the introduction, how they integrate quotations, how they connect points back to the question, and how they conclude. Learning from excellent examples can inspire you to adopt similar techniques. However, remember not to memorise essays; instead, learn the methods and style to apply to your own unique arguments.
By consistently applying these tips, you’ll develop the skills and confidence to write outstanding A-Level German essays. Good luck!
How to Get Expert Help
Even with the best guides and self-study, sometimes the boost that pushes an essay from good to great is expert feedback and guidance. If you feel that you could benefit from a professional’s help – whether it’s clarifying difficult aspects of a novel, honing your essay structure, or getting detailed corrections on your German – consider reaching out to a specialist A-level German tutor.
Olesen Tuition is a leading provider of A-level German tuition, known for helping students achieve top results. In fact, 95% of their A-level students have achieved an A* or A in their exams. Here are some ways engaging with an expert (like those at Olesen Tuition) can elevate your essay-writing skills:
Personalised Essay Feedback: It’s invaluable to have someone read your practice essays and point out where you can improve. An experienced tutor will identify if your argument isn’t clear enough, if you’re misunderstanding a theme, or if your German phrasing is off. They can then show you exactly how to fix those issues. For example, they might help refine a weak thesis into a strong one, suggest more sophisticated vocabulary or sentence structures, and correct grammar mistakes. This kind of targeted feedback is hard to get on your own and can quickly boost your confidence.
Expert Insights on Literature and Films: Seasoned tutors often have in-depth knowledge of the set works. At Olesen Tuition, tutors have written detailed guides on works like “Der Besuch der alten Dame”, “Der Vorleser”, “Das Leben der Anderen”, “Goodbye Lenin!” and more. They can share insights or interpretations you might not have considered, enriching your understanding. For instance, they could explore with you the historical context behind a story or discuss symbolism that would impress an examiner. When you bring nuanced perspectives into an essay (backed by evidence), it stands out to markers.
Structured Planning and Revision: Tutors can teach you effective planning strategies and even work through practice questions with you. Olesen Tuition offers intensive A-level German revision courses – these are perfect for practising essay planning under timed conditions, learning model essay outlines, and doing mock essays that are marked with examiner-style comments. If organising your thoughts is a challenge, a tutor will guide you in creating essay plans until it becomes second nature.
Language Skill Improvement: Writing A-level essays is also a language exercise. If certain grammar issues or a limited vocabulary are holding you back, structured lessons can help. Olesen’s tutors (all native speakers with at least 10 years of teaching experience) can give you focused practice on, say, complex sentence structures, use of the subjunctive, or academic phrases – all tailored to A-level topics. Improving your German accuracy and range will not only gain you language marks but also allow you to express your analysis more precisely.
Exam Technique and Confidence: Beyond knowledge and language, there’s exam technique. How do you cope with time pressure? How do you choose which question to answer (if there’s an option)? Tutors can share insider tips – e.g., how to quickly formulate a thesis for an unseen question, or how to allocate your time per section of the essay. Olesen Tuition’s founder, Jens Olesen, has even served as a teacher-examiner for A-level German, so he understands exactly what examiners want. With that kind of guidance, you can approach the exam much more confidently and efficiently.
It’s completely fine (even smart) to seek help – top students often do. Whether you join a weekly class or get one-on-one tutoring, the structured support can make a huge difference. Olesen Tuition offers flexible options, from private lessons to small group courses, both in London and online. This means you can get expert help no matter where you are. Sessions can focus entirely on Paper 2 essay writing, or even on the other papers if needed (since essay skills also overlap with speaking presentations and such). Consider booking a trial session or an intensive holiday revision workshop to target your essay technique.
Writing a high-quality A-level German essay is a skill you can learn and master. With practice, feedback, and possibly some expert coaching, you’ll be able to approach any literature or film question the exam throws at you with analytical sharpness and linguistic finesse. If you’re serious about achieving an A or A*, investing in your skills through additional support could be the step that gets you there. Olesen Tuition’s A-level German specialists are ready to help you refine your essays and boost your exam performance – don’t hesitate to reach out and take your German to the next level.
Viel Erfolg! With hard work and the right guidance, you can excel in your literature and film essays. Remember, every essay is an opportunity to showcase not just your knowledge of German but also your insight into human stories and histories. Good luck, and if you need any help along the way, you know where to find us!
Now It’s Your Turn! 💬
Do you have any questions about A-Level German essay writing? Are there specific areas you’re still unsure about, or do you need more revision guides and personalised feedback?
📩 Leave a comment below with your queries or essay-writing experiences. And don’t forget to check out our A-Level German revision resources on our blog for more guides and tips. Viel Erfolg beim Lernen! (Good luck with your studies!)
On our German language blog, you will find plenty of resources for your A-level German exam preparation, including advice on how to prepare for paper 2 of the A-level German syllabus, revision guides on Der Besuch der alten Dame, Der Vorleser, Das Leben der Anderen and Goodbye Lenin, helpful tips on the A-level German IRP, advice on the A-level German speaking exam etc.
📝 What do you find most challenging about writing German essays? Share your thoughts below! ⬇️
thank you
Could you perhaps post a model answer essay to illustrate the structure you present here?
This series of study guides/a level german tips is excellent! Thank you for putting it out there.